Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,337,191 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.685. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 42.1 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 36.1%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $89,268, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $54,027, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $38,625, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $51,038, a difference of 5.2%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $43,026, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 48.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 33.1%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.34%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.33, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 72.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 46.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 39.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 28.1%), and bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.30%), 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), male disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.72%).