Bhutanese vs European Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
European
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Europeans

Exceptional
Good
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,117
SOCIAL INDEX
78.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
87th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

European Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,213,055 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Europeans within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 42.5 Europeans.
Bhutanese Integration in European Communities

Bhutanese vs European Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and European communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $63,779, a difference of 13.3%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $88,751, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $98,310, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $57,637, a difference of 7.1%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $45,836, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.9%).
Bhutanese vs European Income
Income MetricBhutaneseEuropean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Exceptional
$45,836
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Exceptional
$108,099
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Exceptional
$88,751
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Excellent
$47,915
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Exceptional
$57,637
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Fair
$39,457
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Fair
$51,796
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Excellent
$98,310
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Exceptional
$106,367
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Exceptional
$63,779
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
29.4%

Bhutanese vs European Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and European communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.7%), single female poverty (17.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.68%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Bhutanese vs European Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseEuropean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Poor
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.5%

Bhutanese vs European Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Bhutanese vs European Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseEuropean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Bhutanese vs European Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.79%).
Bhutanese vs European Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseEuropean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
41.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Fair
82.6%

Bhutanese vs European Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and European communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.5%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.3% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.60%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Bhutanese vs European Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseEuropean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Excellent
30.2%

Bhutanese vs European Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Bhutanese vs European Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseEuropean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
93.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
61.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
22.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.6%

Bhutanese vs European Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.8%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.11%), high school diploma (91.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Bhutanese vs European Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseEuropean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Excellent
48.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Excellent
39.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Bhutanese vs European Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Bhutanese vs European Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseEuropean
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%