Bhutanese vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 329,369,068 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $60,581, a difference of 19.3%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $84,965, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $101,387, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $51,224, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $55,382, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 25.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.30%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.35%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.6%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.3%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.3%).