Bhutanese vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,158,486 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.433. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 14.2 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $33,279, a difference of 49.9%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $80,908, a difference of 48.1%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $67,879, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 9.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $47,704, a difference of 19.7%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $33,806, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 102.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 100.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 91.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 39.7%), single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 43.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 46.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 71.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 66.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 54.2%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 52.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.76%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 84.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 75.3%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 55.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.7%).