Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,718,406 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.580. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 25.5 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $62,693, a difference of 15.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $109,335, a difference of 7.7%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $93,051, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $43,309, a difference of 0.78%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $49,316, a difference of 1.2%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $51,624, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.28%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.53%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.1%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (48.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 56.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.41%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%).