Bhutanese vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,659,122 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($119,800 compared to $88,034, a difference of 36.1%), householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $53,232, a difference of 35.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $86,764, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $48,643, a difference of 17.3%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $35,930, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 102.6%), family poverty (7.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 88.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 85.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.1%), single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 34.0%), and single female poverty (17.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 43.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 42.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.9%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 43.4%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 39.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 53.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.9%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.8%).