Bhutanese vs Bahamian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Bahamians

Exceptional
Tragic
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bahamian Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,081,048 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.807. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 44.4 Bahamians.
Bhutanese Integration in Bahamian Communities

Bhutanese vs Bahamian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $75,395, a difference of 45.3%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $82,631, a difference of 45.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $81,369, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $35,125, a difference of 24.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $45,743, a difference of 24.8%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $39,735, a difference of 31.6%).
Bhutanese vs Bahamian Income
Income MetricBhutaneseBahamian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Tragic
$36,427
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Tragic
$82,631
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Tragic
$69,726
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Tragic
$39,735
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Tragic
$44,756
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Tragic
$35,125
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Tragic
$45,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Tragic
$75,395
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Tragic
$81,369
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Tragic
$51,000
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
20.2%

Bhutanese vs Bahamian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 84.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 72.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 71.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.8%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 22.3%).
Bhutanese vs Bahamian Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseBahamian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
17.0%

Bhutanese vs Bahamian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.6%).
Bhutanese vs Bahamian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseBahamian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%

Bhutanese vs Bahamian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Bhutanese vs Bahamian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseBahamian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
82.2%

Bhutanese vs Bahamian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 56.4%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 46.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.28, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.0%).
Bhutanese vs Bahamian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseBahamian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
40.5%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
41.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
40.8%

Bhutanese vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 53.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 31.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.6%).
Bhutanese vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseBahamian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.1%

Bhutanese vs Bahamian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.6%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.7%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
Bhutanese vs Bahamian Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseBahamian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Poor
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Bhutanese vs Bahamian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.1%).
Bhutanese vs Bahamian Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseBahamian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%