Bhutanese vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,402,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $51,523, a difference of 10.8%), householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $67,926, a difference of 6.4%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $95,930, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $61,710, a difference of 0.080%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $51,772, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.7%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 4.7%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.94%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.1%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.58%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.5%).