Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Taiwanese

Exceptional
Good
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Taiwanese Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,575,431 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Taiwanese.
Bhutanese Integration in Taiwanese Communities

Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $62,894, a difference of 14.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $49,804, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $104,180, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 7.3%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $46,455, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $40,576, a difference of 7.6%).
Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Income
Income MetricBhutaneseTaiwanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Exceptional
$46,455
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Exceptional
$107,295
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Exceptional
$89,900
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Excellent
$47,902
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Good
$55,556
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Excellent
$40,576
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Tragic
$49,804
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Exceptional
$101,492
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Excellent
$104,180
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Excellent
$62,894
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Excellent
25.1%

Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseTaiwanese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
12.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
11.0%

Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseTaiwanese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
15.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%

Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.50%).
Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseTaiwanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Exceptional
83.4%

Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.1%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.58%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseTaiwanese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
29.0%

Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 33.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 11.1%).
Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseTaiwanese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Excellent
20.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.0%

Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.71%).
Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseTaiwanese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
93.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Good
66.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Exceptional
40.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.070%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.56%).
Bhutanese vs Taiwanese Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseTaiwanese
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%