Bhutanese vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,232,550 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $52,783, a difference of 8.1%), householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $67,326, a difference of 7.4%), and per capita income ($49,894 compared to $52,649, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($119,800 compared to $120,301, a difference of 0.42%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $108,926, a difference of 0.55%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $43,941, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 14.4%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (48.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.8%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.44%).