Bhutanese vs French Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
French
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

French

Exceptional
Average
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,755
SOCIAL INDEX
55.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
169th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

French Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,024,127 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of French within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.461. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 28.4 French.
Bhutanese Integration in French Communities

Bhutanese vs French Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and French communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $59,656, a difference of 21.2%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $83,468, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $99,824, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $51,230, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $55,350, a difference of 11.6%).
Bhutanese vs French Income
Income MetricBhutaneseFrench
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Average
$43,685
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Average
$102,368
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Fair
$83,468
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Average
$46,296
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Good
$55,350
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Tragic
$38,457
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Tragic
$51,230
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Fair
$93,665
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Average
$99,824
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Fair
$59,656
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
28.7%

Bhutanese vs French Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and French communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 31.3%), single male poverty (11.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Bhutanese vs French Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseFrench
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Good
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Good
16.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
30.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.7%

Bhutanese vs French Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Bhutanese vs French Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseFrench
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.2%

Bhutanese vs French Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
Bhutanese vs French Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseFrench
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
42.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
82.2%

Bhutanese vs French Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and French communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 19.9%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.41%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Bhutanese vs French Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseFrench
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
33.4%

Bhutanese vs French Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Bhutanese vs French Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseFrench
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
21.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
6.9%

Bhutanese vs French Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and French communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.5%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (91.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Bhutanese vs French Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseFrench
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Fair
58.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Fair
45.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Poor
36.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
1.8%

Bhutanese vs French Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.21%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.2%).
Bhutanese vs French Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseFrench
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Poor
23.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%