Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,510,326 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.491. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $61,988, a difference of 16.6%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $103,534, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $103,173, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $56,384, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $39,871, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.2%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 30.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.5%), single male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.1%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.31, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 31.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.44%).