Bhutanese vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,181,523 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $61,244, a difference of 18.0%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $86,164, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $103,507, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 8.1%), median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $56,546, a difference of 9.2%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $47,221, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 22.3%), single female poverty (17.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.6%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.3% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 26.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.9%).