Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,668,009 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $55,582, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $53,621, a difference of 6.5%), and median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $65,406, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $118,318, a difference of 0.48%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $100,699, a difference of 0.55%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $112,010, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 14.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.66%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in family households (65.9% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 5.4%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (48.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.5%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.4%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.2%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.57%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.81%).