Bhutanese vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,961,839 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.385. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 6.2 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $54,474, a difference of 32.7%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $92,231, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $92,554, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $53,275, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $36,904, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 75.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 63.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.54%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (11.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.2%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 31.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.2%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 63.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.8%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.4%).