Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Latvia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Immigrants from Latvia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Immigrants from Latvia
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Latvia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,828,170 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,716,282 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.17%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native Hawaiian | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 30.4% | 20.7% |
| Range | 28.2% | 19.1% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 9.4% |
| Median | 11.9% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and Immigrants from Latvia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |