French American Indian vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,000,065 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 32.1 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $107,870, a difference of 20.1%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $110,635, a difference of 19.1%), and per capita income ($40,244 compared to $47,698, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $51,678, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $40,491, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 37.0%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 7.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and single male poverty (15.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 19.7%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (62.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 31.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.5%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.6%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.5%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.4%).