French American Indian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,770,090 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.693% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 692.7 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 34.6%), median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $48,040, a difference of 5.3%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $38,625, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($76,387 compared to $75,851, a difference of 0.71%), median earnings ($43,333 compared to $43,026, a difference of 0.71%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $54,027, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 25.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.79%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (62.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 54.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 24.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 36.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.50%), bachelor's degree (33.1% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%).