French American Indian vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,166,721 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.318% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 318.0 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $49,412, a difference of 22.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $109,402, a difference of 21.8%), and median family income ($92,872 compared to $112,374, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $53,411, a difference of 9.0%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $41,373, a difference of 12.1%), and wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 38.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.1%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.090%), family households (62.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.40%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 42.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.2%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.5%).