French American Indian vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,391,023 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.206% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 206.1 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $57,384, a difference of 42.6%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $127,430, a difference of 37.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $122,893, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $55,913, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $46,902, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 39.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 35.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 30.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 45.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.0%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.62%), family households (62.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 49.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 42.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 108.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 93.1%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 78.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 59.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 46.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.4%).