French American Indian vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,988,332 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.466% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 466.3 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $55,543, a difference of 13.4%), median household income ($76,387 compared to $84,011, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $59,934, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.040%), per capita income ($40,244 compared to $41,495, a difference of 3.1%), and median family income ($92,872 compared to $97,958, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 30.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.3%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.81%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 30.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.85%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.3%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 36.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.14%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and female disability (13.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.1%).