Chippewa vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,411,792 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 8.4 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $97,297, a difference of 37.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $113,519, a difference of 35.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $107,627, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,521, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $66,694, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 63.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 52.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 99.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 30.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 53.9%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.1%), family households (62.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.64%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 55.3%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 54.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.34%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 68.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 54.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.9%).