Chippewa vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Iroquois
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Iroquois
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,850,666 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 4.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 11.9% | 11.7% |
| Maximum | 87.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 75.7% | 88.3% |
| Mean | 38.7% | 41.3% |
| Median | 35.2% | 32.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.1% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.5% | 46.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 23.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 25.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 24.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Iroquois by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.84%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |