Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,590,928 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.132% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 131.7 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 41.1%), per capita income ($51,770 compared to $41,655, a difference of 24.3%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $94,466, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $52,631, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $40,958, a difference of 6.4%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $45,820, a difference of 14.3%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Tragic $41,655 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Tragic $94,466 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Tragic $80,402 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Fair $45,820 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Tragic $51,446 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Exceptional $40,958 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Good $52,631 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Tragic $89,856 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Tragic $91,357 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Tragic $55,327 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 65.7%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 42.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.4% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Good 19.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 19.2% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 19.3% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Fair 13.0% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Fair 21.2% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Fair 29.6% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.6%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Tragic 22.6% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Poor 9.1% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Average 65.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Tragic 79.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Tragic 30.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Tragic 71.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Poor 84.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Good 84.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.0%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 28.4%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.30%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Tragic 63.6% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 26.4% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 40.9% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.32 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 41.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Poor 12.2% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 36.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 101.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 35.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 35.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 23.7% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 76.3% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 40.9% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 4.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.6%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.7%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.7% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.2% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.7% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 93.7% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 92.4% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 91.1% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 89.4% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 86.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Tragic 61.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Tragic 55.8% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Tragic 43.6% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 35.7% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Fair 14.4% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.61%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 11.7% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Excellent 11.0% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Fair 12.3% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Poor 5.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.0% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 11.4% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Poor 23.9% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Fair 47.7% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.2% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |