Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,432,123 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 29.7 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.
Luxembourger Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 41.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $91,357, a difference of 13.3%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $94,466, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $40,958, a difference of 2.7%), median earnings ($47,640 compared to $45,820, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $52,631, a difference of 4.5%).
Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$41,655
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$94,466
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$80,402
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Fair
$45,820
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$51,446
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Exceptional
$40,958
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Good
$52,631
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$89,856
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$91,357
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$55,327
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
19.3%

Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 74.9%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 60.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.32%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
16.0%

Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 50.2%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.3%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.0%).
Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
22.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%

Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 46.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerTrinidadian and Tobagonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
30.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
71.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.9%

Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 38.8%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.53%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
40.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
41.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
36.5%

Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 343.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 55.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 24.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 44.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 53.3%).
Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerTrinidadian and Tobagonian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
23.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
76.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
40.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
13.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
4.3%

Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 63.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerTrinidadian and Tobagonian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
86.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
43.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
35.7%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.9%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 6.4%).
Luxembourger vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.7%
Males
Good
11.1%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Poor
23.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%