Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,077,234 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.337% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 336.6 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $43,539, a difference of 8.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $55,714, a difference of 7.3%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $55,241, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $64,089, a difference of 0.70%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $106,109, a difference of 1.1%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Average $43,539 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Excellent $106,252 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Exceptional $91,541 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Excellent $47,671 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Good $55,241 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Excellent $40,558 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Exceptional $55,714 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Exceptional $100,283 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Exceptional $106,109 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Exceptional $64,089 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Exceptional 24.8% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.1%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.35%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Excellent 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Excellent 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 17.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 27.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.7%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.94%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Excellent 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Average 82.8% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.4%), family households (63.5% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (46.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 67.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.36 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Average 6.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 36.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Exceptional 59.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 23.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.3%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 92.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Tragic 90.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 89.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Tragic 87.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 84.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Fair 64.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Fair 58.5% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Fair 45.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Fair 36.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Poor 1.7% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.14%), male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Good 3.0% | Good 3.0% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Poor 2.5% |