Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,521,204 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084 and weighted average of 48.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,211,574 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 48.4%, a difference of 0.27%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Czechoslovakian	Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Minimum	7.6%	33.6%
Maximum	100.0%	88.5%
Range	92.4%	54.9%
Mean	54.5%	52.2%
Median	53.6%	50.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	45.3%	47.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	65.4%	54.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	20.1%	6.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	18.3%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	18.1%	8.3%

Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Indonesia (48.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (48.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (48.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Austrian (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from China (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Jordanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from North America (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Whites/Caucasians	99.3 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 48.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.3 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 48.6%
Austrians	99.3 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 48.6%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.3 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 48.6%
Poles	99.2 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 48.5%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.2 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 48.5%
Czechoslovakians	99.2 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 48.5%
Croatians	99.1 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 48.5%
Bulgarians	99.1 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 48.5%
Luxembourgers	99.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 48.5%
Basques	99.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 48.4%
Northern Europeans	99.0 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.0 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 48.4%
Jordanians	98.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 48.4%
Romanians	98.9 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	98.9 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| China	98.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 48.4%
Immigrants \| North America	98.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 48.4%
Laotians	98.8 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 48.4%
Scotch-Irish	98.6 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 48.3%
Immigrants \| Singapore	98.6 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 48.3%