U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,020,735 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 24.0 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $106,164, a difference of 28.3%), median family income ($85,294 compared to $107,715, a difference of 26.3%), and median household income ($71,853 compared to $89,412, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $51,370, a difference of 8.3%), median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $40,977, a difference of 12.5%), and median earnings ($41,448 compared to $48,673, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 54.5%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 45.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.0%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 42.4%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 36.7%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.5%), family households (62.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 77.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.4%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 23.6%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.9%).