Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,224,861 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $106,164, a difference of 17.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $97,185, a difference of 15.4%), and wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $51,370, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $40,977, a difference of 6.7%), and median earnings ($44,118 compared to $48,673, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 31.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.6%), single male poverty (13.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.2%), male unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 41.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.6%).