Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,779,060 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 6.2 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $103,954, a difference of 19.9%), median household income ($78,682 compared to $93,933, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $57,074, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.0%), per capita income ($39,827 compared to $42,694, a difference of 7.2%), and median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $54,958, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 34.3%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.91%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 12.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.2%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 54.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 38.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 11.6%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.27%), ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 22.9%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%).