Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,400,234 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to a decrease of 12.3 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $57,074, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $103,954, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $106,952, a difference of 0.74%), median earnings ($48,673 compared to $48,305, a difference of 0.76%), and median family income ($107,715 compared to $106,544, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 22.2%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.66%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.9%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.19%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 48.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 30.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 73.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 30.3%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 23.5%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.2%).