Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,106,105 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 52.7 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $55,082, a difference of 22.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $112,575, a difference of 15.8%), and median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $66,125, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $54,830, a difference of 6.7%), median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $44,587, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.55%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.58%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 46.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.1%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).