Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,396,173 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.880. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 54.9 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $55,082, a difference of 21.8%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $66,125, a difference of 18.7%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $123,831, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $54,830, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $69,703, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $44,587, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.35%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.8%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.2%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 52.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 51.4%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.4%).