Yup'ik Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Yup'ik Single Male Poverty
31.6%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,853,365 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.524 and weighted average of 31.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.37% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yup'ik and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yup'ik influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Yup'ik simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Hopi (27.5%, a difference of 15.0%), Navajo (25.3%, a difference of 24.8%), Lumbee (25.2%, a difference of 25.7%), Puerto Rican (25.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and Houma (23.5%, a difference of 34.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 31.6% |
Yup'ik Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.019% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 54.2% | 41.1% |
| Median | 71.1% | 42.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.0% | 54.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 79.2% | 39.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 37.7% | 26.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.2% | 26.3% |
Correlation Details
| Yup'ik Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.019% | 37,794,849 | 12.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 183,053 | 14.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 148,621 | 16.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 62,946 | 8.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 89,806 | 14.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 54,935 | 8.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 318,242 | 9.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 16,500 | 20.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 26,698 | 9.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 59,649 | 10.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 38,142 | 20.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.20% | 528 | 40.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.88% | 439 | 53.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.20% | 912 | 100.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.96% | 235 | 25.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 630 | 55.6% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 864 | 46.2% |
[ 54.5% - 55.0% ] 54.98% | 1,768 | 36.4% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.45% | 2,577 | 2.6% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.78% | 900 | 44.4% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.12% | 6,312 | 41.9% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.36% | 830 | 50.0% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.84% | 8,157 | 47.9% |
[ 72.5% - 73.0% ] 72.89% | 760 | 58.8% |
[ 73.0% - 73.5% ] 73.15% | 596 | 50.0% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.80% | 1,206 | 39.1% |
[ 76.0% - 76.5% ] 76.04% | 1,828 | 33.3% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.99% | 843 | 57.1% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.27% | 2,074 | 53.3% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.92% | 4,184 | 59.3% |
[ 81.0% - 81.5% ] 81.19% | 1,308 | 45.8% |
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.77% | 616 | 52.9% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.63% | 5,358 | 43.6% |
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.29% | 992 | 48.4% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.91% | 3,389 | 25.2% |
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.05% | 88 | 100.0% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.76% | 4,558 | 35.6% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.49% | 522 | 11.1% |
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.40% | 3,128 | 56.1% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.59% | 1,178 | 80.0% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.20% | 2,209 | 59.9% |
[ 97.5% - 98.0% ] 97.67% | 430 | 100.0% |
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.43% | 353 | 11.1% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 152 | 100.0% |