Yup'ik vs Indian (Asian) Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Indian (Asian)
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Yup'ik
Indians (Asian)
26.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Indian (Asian) Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,804,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 26.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,253,971 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 48.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 26.6% |
| Range | 97.1% | 21.9% |
| Mean | 36.3% | 15.3% |
| Median | 30.7% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.3% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.3% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.0% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.0% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.74%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |