Yup'ik vs South American Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yup'ik
South American
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Yup'ik
South Americans
26.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs South American Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,804,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 26.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,993,980 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 32.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | South American |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 9.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 46.7% |
| Range | 97.1% | 37.3% |
| Mean | 36.3% | 20.2% |
| Median | 30.7% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.3% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.3% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.0% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.0% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.74%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |