Yup'ik Poverty
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Select to Compare
Poverty
Yup'ik Poverty
20.8%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,963,253 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 20.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.23% in poverty level.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yup'ik and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yup'ik influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Yup'ik simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Crow (20.7%, a difference of 0.75%), Yuman (20.2%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (21.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and Pima (21.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 24.4% |
Yup'ik Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik Data | Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.022% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 72.4% |
| Range | 100.0% | 71.3% |
| Mean | 50.5% | 22.6% |
| Median | 60.7% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.7% | 33.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 74.7% | 22.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.9% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.6% | 13.7% |
Correlation Details
| Yup'ik Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 38,689,483 | 14.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 263,209 | 9.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 184,613 | 9.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 92,710 | 9.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 95,408 | 11.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 57,473 | 10.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 321,211 | 9.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 24,258 | 11.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 27,609 | 10.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.96% | 30,662 | 7.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 59,649 | 12.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.67% | 3,087 | 7.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 38,793 | 20.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 1,588 | 22.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.88% | 439 | 12.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.31% | 1,707 | 6.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.71% | 2,027 | 8.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.49% | 383 | 1.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 51 | 41.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 41 | 37.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.07% | 836 | 14.2% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.84% | 95 | 11.6% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 90 | 11.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.20% | 912 | 14.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 450 | 3.6% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.96% | 235 | 18.9% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 630 | 18.4% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 864 | 28.4% |
[ 54.5% - 55.0% ] 54.98% | 1,768 | 39.6% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.30% | 1,602 | 37.2% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.78% | 92 | 7.8% |
[ 60.0% - 60.5% ] 60.14% | 715 | 17.9% |
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.74% | 2,175 | 11.2% |
[ 61.0% - 61.5% ] 61.34% | 551 | 11.8% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.45% | 2,577 | 12.2% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.78% | 900 | 34.7% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.12% | 6,312 | 12.6% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.36% | 830 | 38.1% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.84% | 8,157 | 19.4% |
[ 72.5% - 73.0% ] 72.89% | 760 | 39.3% |
[ 73.0% - 73.5% ] 73.15% | 596 | 24.8% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.79% | 1,442 | 27.2% |
[ 76.0% - 76.5% ] 76.04% | 1,828 | 27.5% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.99% | 843 | 48.5% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.27% | 2,316 | 31.3% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.92% | 4,184 | 35.8% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.82% | 146 | 27.4% |
[ 81.0% - 81.5% ] 81.19% | 1,308 | 28.0% |
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.77% | 616 | 21.6% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.63% | 5,358 | 23.2% |
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.29% | 992 | 28.6% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.91% | 3,389 | 33.0% |
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.11% | 190 | 16.8% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.76% | 4,614 | 31.4% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.49% | 614 | 45.0% |
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.59% | 234 | 16.2% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.53% | 950 | 29.1% |
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.40% | 3,128 | 38.2% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.59% | 1,178 | 15.4% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.20% | 2,209 | 40.5% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.77% | 62 | 72.4% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.43% | 778 | 46.0% |
[ 97.5% - 98.0% ] 97.67% | 430 | 34.1% |
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.43% | 353 | 13.3% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 543 | 40.3% |