Yup'ik Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Select to Compare
Male Poverty
Yup'ik Male Poverty
20.4%
POVERTY | MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,962,746 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 20.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.24% in poverty level among males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yup'ik and poverty level among males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yup'ik influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among males within an area, or if Yup'ik simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Pima (20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |
Yup'ik Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yup'ik Data | Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 55.6% |
Range | 100.0% | 55.1% |
Mean | 50.5% | 21.5% |
Median | 60.7% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.7% | 30.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 74.7% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.9% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.6% | 13.6% |
Correlation Details
Yup'ik Percentile | Sample Size | Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 38,689,483 | 13.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 263,209 | 8.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 184,613 | 8.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 92,710 | 8.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 95,408 | 9.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 57,072 | 9.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 321,211 | 8.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 24,258 | 11.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 27,609 | 8.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.96% | 30,662 | 7.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 59,649 | 11.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.67% | 2,981 | 5.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 38,793 | 18.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 1,588 | 24.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.88% | 439 | 12.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.31% | 1,707 | 0.50% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.71% | 2,027 | 8.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.49% | 383 | 0.53% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 51 | 16.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 41 | 40.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.07% | 836 | 16.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.84% | 95 | 10.6% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 90 | 9.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.20% | 912 | 8.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 450 | 2.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.96% | 235 | 20.6% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 630 | 20.5% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 864 | 17.5% |
[ 54.5% - 55.0% ] 54.98% | 1,768 | 26.6% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.30% | 1,602 | 42.5% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.78% | 92 | 9.1% |
[ 60.0% - 60.5% ] 60.14% | 715 | 20.5% |
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.74% | 2,175 | 7.7% |
[ 61.0% - 61.5% ] 61.34% | 551 | 13.5% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.45% | 2,577 | 9.3% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.78% | 900 | 39.4% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.12% | 6,312 | 11.9% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.36% | 830 | 43.5% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.84% | 8,157 | 19.3% |
[ 72.5% - 73.0% ] 72.89% | 760 | 39.9% |
[ 73.0% - 73.5% ] 73.15% | 596 | 23.4% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.79% | 1,442 | 30.0% |
[ 76.0% - 76.5% ] 76.04% | 1,828 | 28.3% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.99% | 843 | 47.6% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.27% | 2,316 | 30.2% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.92% | 4,184 | 41.3% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.82% | 146 | 22.2% |
[ 81.0% - 81.5% ] 81.19% | 1,308 | 32.0% |
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.77% | 616 | 24.3% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.63% | 5,358 | 24.2% |
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.29% | 992 | 29.1% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.91% | 3,389 | 35.1% |
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.11% | 190 | 13.3% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.76% | 4,614 | 30.1% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.49% | 614 | 39.2% |
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.59% | 234 | 14.6% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.53% | 950 | 28.8% |
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.40% | 3,128 | 34.4% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.59% | 1,178 | 16.1% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.20% | 2,209 | 40.3% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.77% | 62 | 55.6% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.43% | 778 | 49.5% |
[ 97.5% - 98.0% ] 97.67% | 430 | 30.7% |
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.43% | 353 | 12.6% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 543 | 45.2% |