Seminole Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Seminole
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Seminole Ambulatory Disability
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,301,825 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 8.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.42% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Seminole and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Seminole influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Seminole simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Seminole by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Chickasaw (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Seminole Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 26.6% | 25.4% |
| Range | 26.5% | 23.3% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 11.5% |
| Median | 4.2% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.0% |
Correlation Details
| Seminole Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 107,220,258 | 6.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 6,398,926 | 7.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 2,256,309 | 7.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 922,888 | 8.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 467,406 | 8.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 194,343 | 10.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,779 | 9.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 124,575 | 9.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 179,231 | 8.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 63,479 | 9.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 30,407 | 11.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 14,866 | 7.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 25,341 | 7.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 61,754 | 7.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 7,561 | 9.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 41,984 | 10.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 22,385 | 12.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 22,869 | 11.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 6,282 | 11.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 1,787 | 10.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 4,003 | 9.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 9,350 | 9.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.96% | 6,920 | 15.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 9,976 | 8.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 4,178 | 11.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.33% | 60 | 16.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 3,964 | 13.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 280 | 12.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 2,422 | 11.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 116 | 18.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 216 | 10.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 162 | 6.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,110 | 9.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 292 | 12.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 403 | 13.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 245 | 12.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 1,086 | 14.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.03% | 313 | 8.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.14% | 168 | 16.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 1,190 | 11.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.89% | 1,166 | 5.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,805 | 14.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 188 | 14.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.67% | 2,019 | 10.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 405 | 16.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.20% | 174 | 18.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.11% | 445 | 8.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 12,329 | 13.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 372 | 17.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 958 | 2.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40% | 2,887 | 14.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.57% | 5,578 | 16.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 1,169 | 17.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.77% | 7,144 | 11.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.01% | 3,124 | 18.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.60% | 564 | 14.2% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.73% | 550 | 9.2% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.56% | 64 | 25.4% |