Seminole In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Seminole
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Seminole In Labor Force | Age 35-44
80.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,299,228 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 80.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.15% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Seminole and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Seminole influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Seminole simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Seminole by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Dutch West Indian (80.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Sioux (80.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Seminole In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 30.8% |
| Maximum | 26.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.5% | 69.2% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 76.9% |
| Median | 4.5% | 77.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 69.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 83.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 13.2% |
Correlation Details
| Seminole Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 107,211,874 | 83.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 6,405,917 | 82.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 2,256,309 | 81.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 922,636 | 81.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 466,751 | 77.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 194,343 | 79.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,779 | 74.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 124,575 | 82.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 179,048 | 81.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 63,479 | 76.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 30,407 | 76.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 14,866 | 83.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 25,341 | 83.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 61,754 | 83.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 7,561 | 69.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 41,984 | 71.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 22,385 | 61.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 22,869 | 78.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 6,282 | 82.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 1,787 | 75.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 4,003 | 77.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 9,350 | 53.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.96% | 6,920 | 76.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 9,848 | 62.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 4,178 | 82.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 3,964 | 75.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 280 | 53.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 2,422 | 76.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 116 | 55.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 216 | 74.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 162 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.06% | 257 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,110 | 77.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 292 | 93.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 403 | 87.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 245 | 82.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.73% | 1,367 | 30.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.03% | 313 | 63.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 1,190 | 82.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.89% | 1,166 | 93.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,805 | 77.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 188 | 92.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.67% | 2,019 | 65.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 405 | 88.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.20% | 174 | 85.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 54 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 12,329 | 72.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 372 | 75.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 958 | 69.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40% | 2,887 | 60.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.57% | 5,578 | 68.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 1,169 | 61.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.77% | 7,144 | 72.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.01% | 3,124 | 59.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.60% | 564 | 60.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.73% | 550 | 84.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 95 | 100.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.56% | 64 | 100.0% |