Seminole In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Seminole
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Seminole In Labor Force | Age > 16
62.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,310,187 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Seminole and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.437 and weighted average of 62.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.76% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Seminole and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Seminole influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Seminole simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Seminole by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Ottawa (62.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Cheyenne (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Cherokee (61.9%, a difference of 0.090%), American (62.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Arapaho (62.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
Seminole In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 24.4% |
| Maximum | 26.6% | 70.1% |
| Range | 26.5% | 45.7% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 53.9% |
| Median | 4.5% | 55.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 47.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 61.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 9.7% |
Correlation Details
| Seminole Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 107,220,258 | 65.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 6,405,917 | 63.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 2,256,309 | 64.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 924,362 | 61.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 467,574 | 60.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 194,343 | 58.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,779 | 57.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 124,575 | 56.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 179,231 | 61.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 63,479 | 61.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 30,407 | 57.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 14,866 | 67.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 25,341 | 65.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 61,754 | 62.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 7,561 | 61.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 41,984 | 55.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 22,385 | 53.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 22,869 | 56.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 6,282 | 59.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 1,787 | 56.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 4,003 | 57.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 9,350 | 45.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.96% | 6,920 | 55.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 9,976 | 53.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 4,178 | 52.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.33% | 60 | 65.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 3,964 | 44.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 280 | 46.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 2,422 | 54.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 116 | 47.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 216 | 60.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 162 | 70.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.06% | 257 | 28.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,110 | 54.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 292 | 52.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 403 | 50.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 245 | 41.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.73% | 1,367 | 64.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.03% | 313 | 43.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.14% | 168 | 62.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 1,190 | 48.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.89% | 1,166 | 65.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,805 | 49.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 188 | 59.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.67% | 2,019 | 54.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 405 | 64.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.20% | 174 | 47.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.11% | 445 | 28.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 54 | 24.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 12,329 | 53.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 372 | 45.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40% | 2,887 | 47.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.57% | 5,578 | 44.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 1,169 | 43.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.77% | 7,144 | 53.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.01% | 3,124 | 39.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.60% | 564 | 47.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.73% | 550 | 60.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 95 | 60.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.56% | 64 | 39.7% |