Seminole vs Immigrants from Yemen Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Seminole
Immigrants from Yemen
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Seminole
Immigrants from Yemen
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole vs Immigrants from Yemen Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,983,009 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 26.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,238,204 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 28.9%, a difference of 8.0%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Seminole | Immigrants from Yemen |
Minimum | 11.1% | 8.3% |
Maximum | 82.4% | 56.0% |
Range | 71.2% | 47.7% |
Mean | 32.3% | 31.0% |
Median | 28.7% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.0% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.2% | 43.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.2% | 20.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.1% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Seminole and Immigrants from Yemen by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.74%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Colville (29.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |