Seminole Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Seminole
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Seminole Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
18.3%
POVERTY | FEMALES 25-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,900,324 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 18.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.97% in poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Seminole and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Seminole influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 within an area, or if Seminole simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Seminole by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Central American Indian (18.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Dutch West Indian (18.4%, a difference of 0.95%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and Inupiat (18.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.6% |
Seminole Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole Data | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 15.0% | 68.4% |
| Range | 15.0% | 60.3% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 26.0% |
| Median | 3.2% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 29.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 11.4% |
Correlation Details
| Seminole Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 107,055,111 | 15.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 6,342,678 | 16.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 2,208,738 | 17.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 897,310 | 17.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 443,940 | 22.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 187,576 | 18.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 136,934 | 26.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 117,069 | 23.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 173,813 | 17.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 58,338 | 17.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 27,298 | 19.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 8,069 | 24.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 23,824 | 8.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 52,039 | 21.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.91% | 6,633 | 8.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 34,926 | 24.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 19,096 | 26.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 21,950 | 25.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 6,282 | 17.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 1,358 | 28.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 2,831 | 21.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 9,281 | 23.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.96% | 6,326 | 29.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 6,028 | 20.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 4,178 | 19.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 3,964 | 19.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 280 | 44.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 2,125 | 27.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 162 | 56.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,110 | 26.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 292 | 16.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 403 | 26.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.03% | 313 | 35.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 1,190 | 38.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.89% | 1,166 | 42.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,805 | 37.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 188 | 25.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.67% | 2,019 | 20.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 405 | 21.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.20% | 174 | 50.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.11% | 445 | 68.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 54 | 25.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 12,329 | 33.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 372 | 14.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40% | 2,887 | 16.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.57% | 5,578 | 22.4% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 1,169 | 29.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.77% | 7,144 | 37.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.01% | 3,124 | 30.8% |