Central American Indian Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Central American Indian Single Mother Poverty
34.3%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,816,529 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529 and weighted average of 34.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.1% in poverty level among single mothers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Central American Indians and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Central American Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Central American Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Alsatian (34.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (34.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Chickasaw (34.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Hopi (34.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and Honduran (34.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Immigrants from Central America | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 33.6% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 33.9% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 34.0% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 34.2% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 34.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 34.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 34.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 34.4% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 34.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 34.8% |
Central American Indian Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.074% | 11.3% |
| Maximum | 39.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.4% | 88.7% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 49.3% |
| Median | 4.9% | 44.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 34.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 62.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 28.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 22.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 21.8% |
Correlation Details
| Central American Indian Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.074% | 188,928,484 | 29.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 67,754,839 | 30.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 36,541,964 | 32.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 12,166,648 | 35.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 5,588,094 | 34.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 3,693,948 | 34.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 2,069,688 | 36.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 1,047,730 | 40.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 818,947 | 31.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 932,941 | 34.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 583,421 | 37.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 250,608 | 51.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 265,907 | 38.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 127,885 | 24.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 169,993 | 34.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 87,135 | 28.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 86,623 | 41.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 64,108 | 23.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 104,437 | 59.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 71,791 | 39.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 65,315 | 38.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 25,035 | 15.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 41,714 | 18.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.89% | 13,457 | 25.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.06% | 4,806 | 41.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 37,203 | 34.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 10,828 | 44.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.57% | 39,457 | 51.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 1,976 | 53.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.90% | 5,775 | 81.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 8,148 | 38.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.50% | 1,528 | 46.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 14,201 | 51.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.82% | 20,869 | 48.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 7,577 | 78.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.53% | 39,406 | 66.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 3,807 | 73.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.57% | 185 | 44.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.92% | 530 | 57.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.15% | 1,608 | 74.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.30% | 795 | 11.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.23% | 1,181 | 100.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.89% | 1,324 | 74.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 736 | 100.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.59% | 11,179 | 62.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.39% | 4,162 | 19.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,386 | 26.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 141 | 50.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.75% | 1,396 | 60.8% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.16% | 3,233 | 85.1% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.54% | 2,190 | 50.7% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.16% | 2,658 | 50.0% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.78% | 1,632 | 57.7% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.95% | 25,542 | 63.4% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.46% | 4,562 | 73.8% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.32% | 362 | 100.0% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.40% | 1,488 | 100.0% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.88% | 37,642 | 67.0% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.48% | 15,304 | 57.2% |