Central American Indian vs Creek Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Creek
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Creek
25.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Creek Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,666,158 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 25.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,486,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 27.4%, a difference of 7.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Creek |
Minimum | 11.0% | 7.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 75.4% |
Range | 89.0% | 68.3% |
Mean | 37.6% | 35.3% |
Median | 33.1% | 34.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.9% | 27.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.0% | 44.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.0% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.3% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.2% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians and Creek by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Apache (27.7%, a difference of 0.99%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |