Central American Indian vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Moroccan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Moroccans
25.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,666,158 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 25.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 21.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Moroccan |
| Minimum | 11.0% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 53.5% |
| Range | 89.0% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 37.6% | 24.5% |
| Median | 33.1% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.9% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.0% | 31.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.0% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.3% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.2% | 10.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |