Central American Indian vs Palestinian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Palestinian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Palestinians
25.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Palestinian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,666,158 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 25.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,894,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 32.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 11.0% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 53.6% |
| Range | 89.0% | 51.0% |
| Mean | 37.6% | 21.7% |
| Median | 33.1% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.9% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.0% | 28.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.0% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.3% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.2% | 11.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Cypriot (19.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Laotian (19.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |