Central American Indian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Central American Indian Single Male Poverty
17.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,936,739 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 17.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.6% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Central American Indians and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Central American Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Central American Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 2.3%), Creek (16.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Menominee (17.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
Central American Indian Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.074% | 9.7% |
| Maximum | 39.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.4% | 90.3% |
| Mean | 8.8% | 43.3% |
| Median | 4.9% | 36.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 56.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 38.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 27.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 27.2% |
Correlation Details
| Central American Indian Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.074% | 176,471,016 | 12.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 63,215,210 | 12.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 34,214,364 | 14.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 11,392,020 | 16.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 5,060,842 | 17.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 3,294,936 | 16.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 1,861,578 | 17.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 969,174 | 17.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 680,089 | 9.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 893,047 | 17.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 553,844 | 18.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 231,242 | 27.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 224,548 | 19.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 110,918 | 18.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.41% | 126,561 | 14.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 28,249 | 18.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 59,405 | 34.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 40,506 | 14.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 99,215 | 38.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 59,799 | 32.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 50,453 | 30.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.62% | 2,980 | 25.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 10,207 | 30.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.95% | 760 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.06% | 6,941 | 52.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 28,325 | 22.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 2,287 | 24.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.57% | 36,405 | 37.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.78% | 6,128 | 31.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.90% | 7,200 | 72.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 4,136 | 50.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.33% | 450 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.50% | 418 | 33.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 3,856 | 38.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.82% | 20,869 | 42.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 7,577 | 71.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.38% | 2,619 | 54.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.53% | 39,406 | 52.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 1,197 | 24.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 1,366 | 25.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.38% | 149 | 37.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.15% | 1,608 | 56.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.23% | 1,181 | 77.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.89% | 1,324 | 56.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.59% | 11,179 | 36.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.07% | 587 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.39% | 4,162 | 24.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,386 | 52.3% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.75% | 1,396 | 44.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.47% | 159 | 85.7% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.92% | 872 | 100.0% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.16% | 3,233 | 54.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.54% | 2,190 | 100.0% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.78% | 1,632 | 84.3% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.95% | 25,542 | 57.6% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.46% | 4,562 | 43.7% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.40% | 1,488 | 100.0% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.88% | 37,642 | 52.3% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.48% | 15,304 | 80.5% |