Central American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Central American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
22.8%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,193,354 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 22.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.6% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Central American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Central American Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Central American Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Congo (22.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.77%), Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Yakama (22.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Central American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.074% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 39.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.4% | 93.3% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 40.6% |
| Median | 5.1% | 32.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 53.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 31.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 25.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 24.8% |
Correlation Details
| Central American Indian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.074% | 189,695,845 | 17.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 67,895,783 | 18.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 36,737,075 | 20.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 12,278,711 | 24.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 5,618,766 | 22.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 3,703,962 | 22.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 2,118,820 | 24.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 1,049,072 | 29.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 805,172 | 19.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 931,557 | 24.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 631,847 | 22.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 260,389 | 34.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 272,991 | 24.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 131,567 | 19.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 172,300 | 22.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 87,135 | 18.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 84,119 | 32.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 64,108 | 23.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 102,388 | 41.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 72,733 | 32.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 64,970 | 27.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 25,425 | 11.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 41,937 | 17.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.89% | 13,405 | 16.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.06% | 4,806 | 18.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 37,203 | 29.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 10,828 | 28.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.57% | 39,457 | 52.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 8,762 | 30.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.90% | 7,444 | 51.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 4,136 | 8.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 8,148 | 44.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.50% | 1,528 | 13.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 13,822 | 16.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.82% | 20,869 | 52.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 7,792 | 51.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.38% | 2,619 | 47.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.53% | 39,406 | 50.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 3,807 | 9.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.57% | 185 | 83.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.91% | 759 | 32.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 2,663 | 32.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.30% | 795 | 73.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.23% | 1,181 | 88.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.89% | 1,324 | 56.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 736 | 53.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.59% | 11,179 | 62.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.39% | 4,162 | 38.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,386 | 36.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 141 | 6.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.75% | 1,396 | 61.6% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.01% | 1,130 | 100.0% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.16% | 3,233 | 69.2% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.54% | 2,190 | 40.6% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.16% | 2,658 | 50.5% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.78% | 1,632 | 89.0% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.95% | 25,542 | 60.0% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.46% | 4,562 | 93.7% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.32% | 362 | 100.0% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.40% | 1,488 | 100.0% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.88% | 37,642 | 55.2% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.48% | 15,304 | 58.2% |