Central American Indian vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Ugandan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Ugandans
25.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,666,158 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 25.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 22.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 11.0% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 89.0% | 94.5% |
| Mean | 37.6% | 23.7% |
| Median | 33.1% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.9% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.0% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.0% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.3% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.2% | 17.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |